← Back to APFA Governance

Association of Professional Flight Attendants

Structural Axes of Authority

Where decisions originate, how they move, and where they terminate inside a single-carrier union.

The Core Design

APFA’s authority architecture is organized around a small number of constitutionally defined bodies. The model is intentionally compact: membership elects national officers and base leadership; base leadership composes the union’s voting board; and a smaller executive body acts between board sessions.

Axis 1: Membership → Elections → Union Authority

APFA’s primary legitimacy pipeline begins with the membership: members elect the national officers and elect base leadership that functions as the local governance and service layer.

This means APFA’s “local” layer is not merely operational — it directly shapes national governance because base presidents sit on the voting Board of Directors by design.

Axis 2: The Board of Directors as the Primary Governing Body

APFA identifies its Board of Directors (BOD) as the body “authorized and empowered” to take lawful action consistent with the Constitution to safeguard the union and member rights.

Composition is structurally significant: the Board consists of the four national officers plus each Base President.

Axis 3: The Executive Committee as the Operating Agent Between Board Sessions

APFA’s Executive Committee (EC) is defined as an agent acting “for and on behalf of” the voting Board of Directors, including interpretation of the Constitution subject to Board approval.

The EC consists of the national officers plus five ad hoc members.

Axis 4: The Base Layer as Governance + Service Delivery

APFA maintains local representation at bases, including Base Presidents, Base Vice Presidents, and Base Council Representatives (BCRs), providing day-to-day member support and operational representation.

Axis 5: Departments, Chairs, and Regional Representatives

In addition to elected leadership, APFA describes national department chairs and regional representatives as part of its organizational structure, providing specialized operational capacity across the system.

Structurally, these roles illustrate a “delegated capacity” layer: specialization and coverage expand without creating a separate constitutional authority center.

Structural Implications

Next