← Back to CWA–AFA Hub

CWA–AFA · Governance Series

Governance and Representation

How representation flows inside AFA (LEC → MEC → International) and how AFA interfaces with CWA governance.

1. Representation Is a Pipeline

For many flight attendants, “the union” feels like a single entity. In practice, representation is a structured pipeline: local representation, system-wide coordination, and national governance. Understanding who does what — and where issues go next — provides the baseline needed to assess responsiveness and accountability later.

2. The AFA Representation Ladder

LEC → MEC → AFA International (Functional Roles)

Level What It Represents Primary Responsibilities
LEC (Local Council) Base / local membership within a carrier Member-facing representation, local casework, communications, local mobilization
MEC (Master Executive Council) Carrier-wide unit (system-wide) System-wide strategy, bargaining coordination, carrier-level policy disputes, escalation of issues
AFA International Sector-wide AFA membership National strategy, institutional programs (safety/legal/comms), cross-carrier expertise, governance infrastructure

This is a simplified functional view for reader clarity. Formal authority boundaries are defined in governing documents.

3. Where CWA Fits (Without District Intermediation)

Unlike most CWA locals that sit within both a sector and a geographic district, AFA’s representational pipeline does not route through district offices. AFA operates as a national sector with its own internal governance ladder, and interfaces with CWA governance primarily through constitutional requirements and convention authority.

Practical takeaway

For flight attendants, most representational action occurs inside AFA’s LEC/MEC/International structure. CWA functions as the constitutional umbrella — not the day-to-day representation layer.

4. Accountability and Escalation

Multi-layer systems can be effective when escalation paths are clear and consistently used. They can also feel slow or unresponsive when responsibility is ambiguous or when escalation becomes circular. This series will later use the structure described here to compare responsiveness and accountability across different governance models.

Sources & Documents